The Wall Street Journal, in an August 19, 2026 story by Krystal Hur, has alerted its readers that "Cantor Lets Hedge Funds Place Big Bets on Kalshi’s Prediction Markets."
You can be forgiven, I believe (I have forgiven myself), if you didn't know that "Cantor" is an investment company that offers "a full suite of global capabilities—including investment banking, capital markets, prime services, research, and asset management—backed by a team that provides tailored support to meet clients’ unique financial needs."
If you don't know about "Kalshi," however, I think you may not have been paying enough attention to what is going on in modern America. Kalshi is a so-called, "prediction market." "Polymarket" is another one. Here's what a "prediction market" is all about, according to Wikipedia:
Prediction markets, also known as betting markets, information markets, decision markets, idea futures, or event derivatives, are open markets that enable the prediction of specific outcomes using financial incentives. They are exchange-traded markets established for trading bets in the outcome of various events. The most common form of a prediction market is a binary option market, which will expire at the price of 0 or 100%.
Prediction markets can be thought of as belonging to the more general concept of crowdsourcing which is specially designed to aggregate beliefs on particular topics of interest, where the market price can indicate what the crowd thinks the probability of the event is. Traders with different beliefs trade on contracts whose payoffs are related to the unknown future outcome and the market prices of the contracts are considered as the aggregated belief.
Prediction markets are considered gambling by many governments, and are banned in some locations. Some users and researchers have reported that prediction markets are similar to gambling and can cause addiction.
If you want to invest your money, lots of companies (and individuals) are willing to advise you about your investment options, and what might be a good way to deal with future uncertainties. Will inflation continue, for instance? Maybe, or maybe not. Those who pay close attention (as investment advisors are supposed to do) are likely to have informed opinions on whether and to what extent inflation may increase, or decrease, in the future. Depending on whether future inflation is likely, or not, it might be prudent and smart to make one kind of investment - or not prudent and smart to make that investment. Cantor, for instance (even though I had never heard of it before) has traditionally based its business on providing good advice to those who have money, and who want to know what to do with that money that isn't immediately needed for food, clothing, shelter and entertainment (and, perhaps, college tuition for children or grandchildren).
It is not unusual to say that investment decisions are "bets" on the future. However, when investments are made, or not, they have traditionally been informed by an evaluation of something beyond one's personal ideas about what might happen. For instance, the fact that conditions in the Strait of Hormuz area now a significant constraint on energy availability, worldwide, is a significant factor in deciding whether or not a factory located in Germany, for instance, will likely continue to be profitable, or whether it won't. Someone deciding that the Strait of Hormuz will likely be reopened as it was prior to the war with Iran can be said to be "betting" on that outcome, as they make investment decisions, or as they provide investment advice.
So what about "prediction markets"? Aren't the "bets" made on those "prediction markets" just the same kind of "bets"?
Actually, no. Market and investment advisors are advising their clients to "bet" on one possibility, rather than another, on the basis of the advisor's judgment related to objective realities.
"Prediction markets" (except when distorted and "played" by those with "insider knowledge," which is another topic and a real problem) represent "bets" not on a prediction based on objective "facts," but on a prediction about what other people will think and do. "Prediction markets," in other words, are largely responsive not to "objective" facts, but to "subjective" judgments by other people making their "bets" on the same basis.
Hopefully, we can all see the difference, and thus understand that "prediction markets" are, in fact, a type of "gambling" in a way that typical investment decisions are not.
As you can undoubtedly see, I am advising against any "investments" in "prediction markets" when the "investor" doesn't understand that what is really going on is just gambling on a guess. I have proffered similar advice, in the past, with respect to cryptocurrency, and I continue to recommend this wonderful book: Extraordinary Popular Delusions And The Madness Of Crowds.
The folks at Cantor, to the extent that they are telling Cantor's customers and potential customers that "prediction market" bets are the same as the kind of investment "bets" they have traditionally advised about, should be ashamed of themselves!
Image Credit:
https://t2conline.com/are-stock-trading-and-betting-just-two-sides-of-the-same-coin/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment!