Thursday, June 29, 2017

#180 / Where Do I Sign Up?

Dave Lindorff is an American investigative reporter. He writes a column for CounterPunch, and is a contributor to Businessweek, The Nation, Extra!, and

Lindorff's recent article, "We need a mass movement to demand radical progressive change," can be found on the Nation of Change website. His article is subtitled, "Is the Democratic Party beyond hope?"

Lindorff doesn't answer that question directly, but he certainly isn't optimistic that the Democratic Party can be transformed: 

Clearly to be a viable and genuine opposition party to the ruling Republicans, the Democratic Party would have to be thoroughly deconstructed and rebuilt. The millionaire-packed Democratic National Committee leadership – the lobbyists, the elected officials and the well-heeled donors – would have to be tossed out entirely, and replaced by genuine progressives, labor activists, environmentalists, representatives of various minority groups and (gasp!) socialists. It would need a platform that was unequivocal and unflinching in its call for expanded and more generous Social Security benefits, for a well funded Medicare for All program, for a new National Labor Relations Act that routinizes the forming of labor unions and that safeguards, through severe penalties on recalcitrant employers, the right to bargain for contracts. It would have to stand foursquare for an emergency mobilization against climate change, and it would have to renounce the debunked neoliberal approach of coddling the rich and tossing crumbs to the poor, by standing for much higher taxes on the former and well-funded programs to help the latter. And finally, it would have to call for dramatic cuts in the military (not defense!) budget, and an end to U.S. imperialism and militarism abroad.

Lindorff is also skeptical that any "third party" can step forward, successfully to advance a political program like the one he outlines above: 

As the Green Party and various socialist parties over the years have painfully learned, restrictive ballot and media access laws at the federal, state and local level, and a total lack of rules limiting corporate funding of campaigns, put in place by the two big parties, effectively give those two parties a lock on national elections, consigning third parties to the sidelines.

Lindorff concludes that what is needed is a "movement on the streets and in local communities." Such a movement, says Lindorff, "must present the political establishment with the untenable prospect of ongoing mass militant opposition to which it has to respond."

Lindorff argues for a movement that will be broad and inclusive, "built around demands that virtually all Americans, or at least a solid majority, can agree with." Here is Lindorff's list:

  • A Medicare for All health care system modeled on what they have in Canada.
  • An end to U.S. militarism abroad and at home, the closing of most if not all foreign bases, an end to all U.S. wars and arms sales to conflict zones, and a reduction in the U.S. military budget by 50%. As well, a call for the U.S. to return to negotiations with all nuclear nations to eliminate these weapons of mass destruction.
  • A fair, non-racist immigration policy that is generous in accepting political refugees, that doesn’t threaten with deportation those young people brought illegally into the U.S. not by their own choice, that, while securing borders to prevent illegal crossings, is humane and follows constitutional norms in dealing with those who sneak into the country seeking work, and that, finally, recognizes and works to end the role that U.S. economic and foreign policy plays in creating economic problems in neighboring countries that compel people to try and enter the U.S. seeking work.
  • A crash program to reduce U.S. carbon emissions, and to help other countries do so, particularly those developing countries that have limited resources and that are being most impacted already by global warming.
  • A program to shift funding for education away from its current reliance on local property taxes to federal funding on a per-student basis in order to equalize access to good public schools – an approach taken by most European countries — and a program of free college education to all who qualify for admission at public institutions of higher education. 
  • A jobs program modeled on the New Deal’s Works Progress Administration, to create jobs for the jobless in needed areas like infrastructure repair, parks maintenance, environmental clean-up, school safety monitoring and the like.
  • A living federal minimum wage.
  • A break-up of the too-big-to-fail banks, re-passage of the Glass-Steagal Act separating banks and investment banks, and a reinvigoration of anti-trust law to prevent the creation of monopolies or oligopolies, and undo those that already exist. 
  • Elimination of the cap on income subject to the Social Security (FICA) payroll tax, and addition of a 0.25% transaction tax on all stock and bond trades except in tax-advantaged retirement plans, a much higher capital gains tax and a restoration of the inheritance tax to apply to all inherited wealth above $100,000. All these new revenues would be used to raise Social Security benefits sufficiently to ensure for the first time a decent income for all Americans in retirement.

The program Lindorff outlines makes me want to ask, "Where do I sign up?" But sign up for what, exactly? That's really the question. Here is how Lindorff sees it all playing out: 

I believe that a such national movement, which must be grass-roots, democratic and locally based, if it organized frequent mass actions both in Washington and in the states and municipalities, swarming of Congressional offices both in the capital and in home districts, and pressing candidates during election years, would compel at least the Democratic Party, and perhaps even many Republican office-holders, to act, even if they hold antithetical political views. 
The key is to avoid being co-opted by the Democratic Party, and to remain an independent movement.

My own sense is that marches like the one pictured above (this photo taken from Lindorff's posting)  and other "mass actions," are generally NOT "multi-issue" marches and actions, with demands running from cutting military spending to changing the rules for Social Security deductions from upper-income earners.

In fact, single-issues mobilize the crowds. And so do candidates!

Who is running for President (and Congress, and the State Legislature, and local offices) on a platform like the one outlined, above? I think we are going to have to have something more than protests in the street. There will need to be credible candidates, seeking to take power away from those who won't sign on for these kind of changes.

Where do I sign up?

Image Credit:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comment!