![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6l5JVaW3_5sXeZ9yhUzPZTo425iyY6wWne9VmfJow_Nrxz08McmYxEObIpoTRR_wto9El3hGkxl25w2_oGBPRMgsMx5y_SHN5QK030oh6_UmymdEvOtpEYH3_3OtWfy9kpP2205GgUbTP/s320/images.jpg)
I "properly understand" revolution from having read (many times) On Revolution, by Hannah Arendt.
It strikes me that the early Quakers, in fact, were carrying out a rather revolutionary agenda. One without guns. One without violence (at least none that they practiced against others).
Those interested in exploring whether a revolutionary politics of "now" is actually possible, might well study just what the early Quakers were about.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment!